Dietary supplement company’s chilling lawsuit to silence Harvard researcher

What does a dietary supplement company with a shady past do when reputable researchers find that six of the dietary supplements it sells contain an illegal, potentially dangerous drug in them?

It sues the researcher for $200 million claiming defamation.supplement trial

That’s what happened to Pieter Cohen, an assistant professor of medicine at the Harvard Medical School, who tests dietary supplements for the presence of illegal ingredients.

The first detailed look at this legal clash was published this week by STAT, a health and medicine news website.  (You can find a link to STAT’s full story at the end of this post.)

Finding an illegal ingredient

Pieter Cohen and his colleagues in 2015 published the results of a laboratory analysis of 21 supplements that found an illegal amphetamine-like drug called BMPEA in 11 of them.  The study’s details appeared in the scientific journal Drug Testing and Analysis. Canadian health officials have called BMPEA a “serious health risk.”

Within two weeks, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered the manufacturers to recall the products.

A dietary supplement company looks to “silence this guy”

Six of the tainted supplements were manufactured by Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals of Norcross, Georgia, a company that sells $100 million of supplements a year. Twice before, HiTech has gotten into trouble with the FDA for selling illegal supplements. The company’s founder and CEO, Jared Wheat, has also served two prison terms for selling illegal drugs.

All six of the Hi-Tech products were marketed as weight-loss pills. Wheat claims he lost $14 million worth of business because of Cohen’s analysis.

Wheat also said he got “hundreds” of supportive calls and emails from people “hoping that we were able to silence this guy.”

The $300,000 to $400,000 lawsuit

Hi-Tech Pharmaceuticals sued Pieter Cohen and his research team in Georgia for $200 million. When that case was dismissed, Wheat re-filed it in Massachusetts where Cohen works.

A seven-day trial took place last October. Hi-Tech didn’t deny the presence of BMPEA in its products. Instead, it claimed that the substance was a legal dietary supplement ingredient, but offered no evidence to prove that.

The jury quickly declared Cohen not guilty.

Although the lawsuit cost his company $300,000 to $400,000, Wheat said it was worth it. “Hopefully, this will deter others,” he told STAT.

The aftermath

The year-long ordeal was, indeed, grueling for Cohen. Fortunately, he had the backing of Harvard University.

And he was not deterred. A few days after the verdict, Cohen submitted for publication a new study of dietary supplements.

“My experience,” he told STAT, “has really reinforced to me why it is so important to not only continue the research we’re doing but to be very aggressive about speaking out about it.”

Meanwhile, the six tainted supplements from Hi-Tech are still on the market. Wheat has refused to recall them. Instead, he said he made minor modifications to some of the formulas in order to placate his distributors.

 

Here’s the original study that provoked the lawsuit: An amphetamine isomer whose efficacy and safety in humans has never been studied, β-methylphenylethylamine (BMPEA), is found in multiple dietary supplements.

Here’s the STAT article: A supplement maker tried to silence this Harvard doctor — and put academic freedom on trial by Rebecca Robbins.

Related post

Find this article about dietary supplements interesting and useful? Nutrition Action Healthletter subscribers regularly get sound, timely information about how nutrients can affect their health. They also receive science-based advice about diet and diabetes, heart disease, cancer, osteoarthritis, and other chronic diseases; delicious recipes; and detailed analyses of the healthy and unhealthy foods in supermarkets and restaurants. If you’re not already subscribing to the world’s most popular nutrition newsletter, click here to join hundreds of thousands of fellow health-minded consumers.

5 Replies to “Dietary supplement company’s chilling lawsuit to silence Harvard researcher”

    1. That information is provided in a table in the original paper. There’s a link at the end of this post. We should repeat that Hi-Tech says they’ve modified the formulas of at least some of the implicated products.

  1. I’m floored that there was a lawsuit against a researcher who proved there were illegal substances in a product marketed to be healthy. Further, the plaintiff sought to sue again while never actually addressing the gist of the lawsuit (illegal substances). How did he believe he’d win, especially with having served prison time for selling illegal drug substances? Then in the end after losing twice, Wheat claimed that he hope it would deter researchers from conducting studies against dubious supplement manufacturers. WTF! Wheat should have lost everything, let alone only $14 million!

    I sincerely hope this lawsuit story promotes more researchers like Dr. Cohen to conduct even more studies to not only test supplements effectiveness, but challenge the substances in the supplement. Long live academic research!

    Dr. C.

  2. If yoy don’t mind terrifying yourself, try reading this well researched book: PHAKE–the deadly world of falsified and substandared medicines by by Roger Bate. Enjoy!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *